
Who, if I cried out, would hear me among the angels’ hierarchies? And even if one of them pressed me suddenly against his heart: I would be consumed in that overwhelming existence. For beauty is nothing but the beginning of terror, which we are still just able to endure, and we are so awed because it serenely disdains
to annihilate us. Every angel is terrifying. - From “The First Elegy” by Rainer Maria Rilke
Every angel is terrifying. Every “pollen of the flowering Godhead,
[those] joints of pure light… mirrors, which scoop up the beauty that
has streamed from their face, and gather it back into themselves,
entire, (The Second Elegy)” every one is terrifying to Rilke and how
could they be otherwise when they stand as representations of a
perfection that the human, no matter how good in action and aspiration,
probably can’t attain (depending on one‘s faith and outlook). They
stand as a mirror that reflects back the vast distances between who we
are currently and the, perhaps, infantile purity that we spend our
whole lives ignoring, returning to, or falling from, and sight of that
distance is frightful.
The question is, how does one continue advancing towards the goal of
purity, when with every step one is reminded by crushing fear that you
will likely die before you get there. I should say that by purity I
mean something similar to Buddhahood, wherein the mind has been
cleansed of what ails it and the soul can thus blossom, or reveal its
blossoming. How does one continue? I have been told to keep advancing
out of mind as having a goal of it, only further ills the mind, but is
that enough? Rilke says later in “The First Elegy” that “the knowing
animals are aware/ that we are not really at home in/ our interpreted
world,” suggesting that we do not “belong” in this world, and thus
explaining why and how it is we seek to return to a pure spiritual
state despite how frightening it is; our home is in that state, at
least according to this line of thinking. I then ask, and have asked
myself many times, then why are we here at all? Forget that. We are
here, for some reason, but does being here mean we have a
responsibility to enjoy life in ways that are spiritual and ways that
are not? To make this less abstract, I feel spiritually healthier when
I exercise empathy but does that mean that I should live a monkish
existence of service in hopes of serving my spirit or should I be
selfish and keep some of my money and time to spend on things I don’t
really need, because by being alive in this body I have a
responsibility that is equal to myself as it is to the world?
Even while keeping the goal out of mind, it is terrifying, this
prospect of spiritual responsibility for what’s beyond myself. And it
is terrifying equally, not knowing what to do. In that way these
choices I must make for myself, are like having had an encounter with
an angel. Just asking the questions is good and the beginning of
something good, even as I run risk of annihilation, of one or more
sides of myself, which I don’t think a person can ever be ready for.
P.S. Check out “The selected poetry of Rainer Maria Rilke” as
translated by Stephen Mitchell. That is where these selections were
culled from. And the image is by Gustave Dore.